Skip to content

Conversation

tmiasko
Copy link
Contributor

@tmiasko tmiasko commented May 31, 2021

The special casing of box_free predates the use of dominators in
analyzer. It is no longer necessary now that analyzer verifies that
the first assignment dominates all uses.

The special casing of `box_free` predates the use of dominators in
analyzer. It is no longer necessary now that analyzer verifies that
the first assignment dominates all uses.
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 31, 2021
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@nagisa
Copy link
Member

nagisa commented Jun 5, 2021

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 5, 2021

📌 Commit 76695c4 has been approved by nagisa

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 5, 2021
@nagisa
Copy link
Member

nagisa commented Jun 5, 2021

@bors rollup=never for perf

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 5, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 76695c4 with merge 9104c89...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 5, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: nagisa
Pushing 9104c89 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jun 5, 2021
@bors bors merged commit 9104c89 into rust-lang:master Jun 5, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.54.0 milestone Jun 5, 2021
@tmiasko tmiasko deleted the box-free branch June 5, 2021 16:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants